Crysis 3: Making that ludicrous rig you bought completely worth it

Splashing out on a behemoth of a gaming PC is a bit like issuing a challenge to the deities of our fine hobby. Just try and push my rig to the limit, you might cry to an invisible man. Or, if you are a smug bastard like me, you may revel in the fact that you can max out everything without causing your PC to even bat an eyelid, were they to ever develop ocular features.

The last time a game’s system requirements slapped me in the face and made me swallow my tongue was with the tropical shooting romp, Crysis. The minimum requirements weren’t too outrageous, but to really make the game shine you needed to either be from the future or have more money than I ever have. So, it shouldn’t come as a surprise that Crytek are at it again, this time with Crysis 3.

Here they are, in all their glory:

Minimum

• Windows Vista, Windows 7 or Windows 8
• DirectX 11 graphics card with 1Gb Video RAM
• Dual core CPU
• 2GB Memory (3GB on Vista)
• Example 1 (Nvidia/Intel):
• Nvidia GTS 450
• Intel Core2 Duo 2.4 Ghz (E6600)
• Example 2 (AMD):
• AMD Radeon HD5770
• AMD Athlon64 X2 2.7 Ghz (5200+)

Recommended

• Windows Vista, Windows 7 or Windows 8
• DirectX 11 graphics card with 1GB Video RAM
• Quad core GPU
• 4GB Memory
• Example 1 (Nvidia/Intel):
• Nvidia GTX 560
• Intel Core i5-750
• Example 2 (AMD):
• AMD Radeon HD5870
• AMD Phenom II X4 805

High Performance

• Windows Vista, Windows 7 or Windows 8
• Latest DirectX 11 graphics card
• Latest quad core CPU
• SLI / Crossfire configurations will run even better
• 8GB Memory
• Example 1 (Nvidia/Intel):
• NVidia GTX 680
• Intel Core i7-2600k
• Example 2 (AMD):
• AMD Radeon HD7970
• AMD Bulldozer FX4150

The minimum requirements aren’t too outrageous, though it notably requires a DirectX 11 graphics card. The recommended list clearly has a typo, as a “quad core GPU” makes no sense whatsoever, but again, most of the list is par for the course. When the fact that this is a multi-platform title is taken into consideration, however, these do seem a tad steep, with even the minimum requiring substantially more oomph than a console can provide.

Then we get to the high performance requirements, and that’s where it gets interesting. A GTX 680? Oh yeah, no problem, that will only set you back just shy of £500, around £480 on Overclockers.co.uk at a glance.  The CPU requirements aren’t to be scoffed at, either. My fairly new rig, which I built in July, should be able to just about scrape through on the absolute highest settings, though undoubtedly with a slightly diminished frame rate, so I feel somewhat prepared.

To see any game, let alone one that isn’t a PC exclusive, make such demands warms my cold, shrivelled, abused heart, it really does. One does not build a gaming PC for the good of one’s health, so it’s rather lovely to see a developer catering to what is, I’ll admit, a fairly small market. Of course, the game could also be appallingly optimised, but let’s not let cynicism rain on our parade.

That said, if the days of PC gamers getting the shaft are coming to an end, what will we do with our righteous indignation? Oh yes, Rockstar still haven’t released any information on the PC version of Grand Theft Auto V. I was getting worried for a moment.


  • http://twitter.com/ricochetguro Stephen Something

    Pretty excited to see how I’ll be able to run this, only have a GTX 670 which I don’t think will be too big an issue as I have a factory overclocked one and if nothing else I can get another for SLI. Am a bit worried about the CPU though, have an I5-3570 which is good but certainly not an I7-2600k. Just hope that one’s not recommended because the game uses hyperthreading.

    In any case I imagine I’ll be able to run the game at max settings at least 30 frames per second, perhaps 60 if I turn down anti aliasing.

    • http://twitter.com/FraserIBrown Fraser Brown

      I’ve got a very similar rig to you, having both the GTX 670 and I5-3570. I suspect that running it at max settings will be more than possible, and honestly, 30 fps isn’t completely awful if it looks as good as these requirements imply. I can live without AA if needs be.

      It’s worth noting that it says “latest quad core CPU”, and the I5-3570 only came out in spring and is still pretty powerful. The I7-2600k is likely just the example they selected because it’s a bit of a powerhouse.

  • Liam Dean

    I should also be able to run the game at near max settings with the computer I built this year. I have to ask myself though “do I actually want to?” I found Crysis 2 to be very underwhelming as a gaming experience in spite of its pretty graphics. Sure, it’ll be a good way to test the capabilities of my rig, but when the gameplay is so lackluster should I really bother? The depressing reality is that I probably will :/